No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
LATKA - B2B SaaS Blog
  • Full SaaS Database
  • Metrics
    • ARR
    • ARPU
    • ACV
    • CAC
    • Churn Rate
    • Run Rate
    • TCV
  • Analysis
  • Lists
  • Bootstrapped
  • Venture Backed
  • By Revenue
    • <$1m
    • $1-10m
    • $10-50m
    • Unicorn ($100m+)
  • By Category (A-E)
    • Analytics Software
    • Artificial Intelligence Software
    • Collaboration & Productivity Software
    • Content Experience Software
    • Content Management Systems
    • CRM & Related Software
    • Development Software
    • Digital Advertising Platforms
    • E-Commerce Software
    • ERP Software
  • By Category (H-Z)
    • Hosting Providers
    • HR Software
    • IT Management Software
    • Office Software
    • Online Appointment Scheduling Software
    • Project Management Software
    • Security Software
    • Supply Chain & Logistics Software
    • Value-Added Resellers (VARS)
    • Vertical Industry Software
  • Full SaaS Database
  • Metrics
    • ARR
    • ARPU
    • ACV
    • CAC
    • Churn Rate
    • Run Rate
    • TCV
  • Analysis
  • Lists
  • Bootstrapped
  • Venture Backed
  • By Revenue
    • <$1m
    • $1-10m
    • $10-50m
    • Unicorn ($100m+)
  • By Category (A-E)
    • Analytics Software
    • Artificial Intelligence Software
    • Collaboration & Productivity Software
    • Content Experience Software
    • Content Management Systems
    • CRM & Related Software
    • Development Software
    • Digital Advertising Platforms
    • E-Commerce Software
    • ERP Software
  • By Category (H-Z)
    • Hosting Providers
    • HR Software
    • IT Management Software
    • Office Software
    • Online Appointment Scheduling Software
    • Project Management Software
    • Security Software
    • Supply Chain & Logistics Software
    • Value-Added Resellers (VARS)
    • Vertical Industry Software
NEWSLETTER
LATKA - B2B SaaS Blog
No Result
View All Result
Home Metrics

The Startup Building Its Way in Public to $50K Organic MRR

by Nathan Latka
February 24, 2021
in Uncategorized
9 min read
0
The Startup Building Its Way in Public to $50K Organic MRR
2.8k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

I had the serendipitous opportunity to speak with Paul Yacoubian in early January 2021 right as Copy.ai was crushing it on Twitter. We had another brief interview a month later, just as I was about to draft this post. Sometimes being timely is just being lucky! 

Update: As of this writing, cofounder Paul Yacoubian has posted that Copy.ai has passed $50K MRR in February 2021.

From 0 to $40K MRR in Under 4 Months

It’s early January 2021, I just finished a call with Copy.ai cofounder Paul Yacoubian, and my interest is piqued.

His new startup, Copy.ai—launched with cofounder Chris Lu—, is on track to increase the previous month’s MRR stat by at least 50%. As January came to a close, they would end up achieving this goal, reaching $40K MRR—in just about three and a half months.

So how did Yacoubian and Lu build their way in public to a benchmark of $40K MRR and how did doubling-down on that strategy supercharge their organic growth in just a few months?

Pretty much like this.

Taglines to Copy

Created by angels and VC partners Paul Yacoubian and Chris Lu, Copy.ai is actually the second idea kicked out the door by the team to be built in public on top of OpenAI’s Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3 (GPT-3) artificial intelligence model.

Their first—Taglines.ai—was built in under a week and saw 500 immediate signups just from a soft launch on Twitter. About twenty or so of those converted to paying accounts while Yacoubian and Lu experimented with their pricing structure, increasing it first from $3/month to $5/month, and then again to $10/month. And though GPT-3 was working well for taglines, Yacoubian and Lu realized that their customer base was hungry for more than just taglines—they were looking for something more flexible in creating longer-form content. Yacoubian and Lu thus pushed forward to explore the idea of building a whole platform of copy-related tools for marketing use-cases.

So they did the simplest thing; they took the Taglines’ back and frontends—built on Firebase and Webflow, respectively—, cloned them, and in October 2020, launched the result on Twitter as Copy.ai.

They saw 2K users in the first couple of days. Just under 2 weeks later, those numbers were increasing by about 300 signups/day.

Funnily enough, even though the Copy.ai domain was already taken, Lu discovered it was for sale for $5K—or leasable for $170/month. In Yacoubian’s own words on the Commerce Hero podcast: “I was like, whipping my credit card out because this is an amazing domain name. So of all the things we’ve done, so far, that decision has been the biggest competitive advantage we’ve had—[literally] just the name of the site.”

Now with a variety of tools that help generate copy ideas for blog content, ad content, hero text, landing page content, etc., Yacoubian and Lu want to explore which types of tools their founder and marketing clientele will desire next.

Tools to aid in copy for social media content, Facebook/LinkedIn/Google ads, sales copy, blog content, eCommerce copy—the list can, and I’m sure does, go on. Is the idea of using AI to generate content 100% virgin territory? No, but there’s just something about the ease of Copy.ai that seems to ease the whole process.

Some of their new additions are already things like a startup name generator for the founder community.

But let’s hop back over and rip apart some numbers.

Finishing the Year’s End on a Hockeystick

Perhaps it’s this easing that has led to insane (arguably hockeystick) growth since Copy.ai’s launch in October of 2020—as I previously noted, their MRR has increased a minimum of 50%/month since launch.

From the launch date in mid-October, they increased their MRR 220% by the end of November (about 6 full weeks), from just around $3.7K to $12.2K. From most any viewpoint, those numbers indicate decent growth, especially for a first month and a half.

That MRR then increased again by 102% to $24.6K by the end of December, and most recently, again by 50% to $36.8K by the end of January 2021. It’ll be interesting to see in a few weeks if they can stay on course and hit at least +50% MRR for February as well, though with currently available data, it’s fairly safe to say that they’ll hit $40K MRR before the month is out, if they haven’t already.

While that MRR percentage continues to decrease by about half every month, it’s worth noting that at their current rate, it’s like that they could hit $50K in MRR just about six months after launch, which tells me that there’s pretty significant growth potential down the road. With low expenses and a growing MRR, Copy.ai can afford to bootstrap their way forward as they continue to tinker with their tools and see what their customers require and respond to most—a customer base that’s grown to just shy of 20K signups just during the winter months.

According to the available data—as of yet, the “building in public” stats on Paul Yacoubian’s Twitter, ha!—October 2020 saw Copy.ai’s userbase shoot to around 8.1K users in the first couple weeks of the tool’s launch. By the end of November, that user-number was up to 19.9K.

In December 2020, Yacoubian started publicly reporting user-numbers in terms of discernable signups, for which the total was around 15K for the month. While this arguably signaled ~25% decrease from November’s haul, my recent discussion with Yacoubian indicated that was as a result of measuring October’s and November’s numbers in terms of total users while subsequently measuring December and January through the lens of actual signups. I also suspect that during this time, Yacoubian and Lu were probably experimenting with their pricing structure to find the right price point at which they could provide the best service to their customers for the best cost on their end. 

In Yacoubian’s own words: “[As we] started to see these organic mentions online…we set our initial pricing and started getting the conversion rates that would make us venture-backable [and] a real business.” 

Those prices—for the record—are currently split into three tiers:

  1. The free trial — Free (obviously) for 7 days; 100 runs a day; plus 24/7 email support
  2. Solo — $35/Month; unlimited runs; access to all tools; plus all the other normal perks
  3. Custom — The offer for larger teams which includes all the normal perks, plus some others I suspect at a unique price offering 

Looking at their pricing page, I’m curious about the number of “runs” per price plan, and make a mental note to return to that momentarily. Before, though, the rest of the user/signup numbers.

That aforementioned December number, however, increased again by the end of January 2021, back up to around 19K signups—another increase of around 16% m/m—, so clearly whatever they did to adjust their initial pricing worked. 

Building More Tools in Public

Copy.ai also seems to be taking an overall kit-oriented approach to their SaaS offering, building out an ever-expanding set of tools that their users can choose from, depending on their needs. 

At launch, their toolkit comprised about 12 or so tools, which grew 5% to 17 tools by the end of November.

By the end of December, though, that 5% was up to 20%, with 20 new tools joining the repertoire for a total of 37. That number then increased again by 15% as they ended January with a total of 52 tools in their belt.

It’s this growing focus on tool expansion that I think gives Copy.ai a unique value proposition. Even Grammarly—wildly successful now—really keeps its value proposition to a narrow lane of offering. And that works for them. But in taking a bit of a broader approach, Copy.ai can arguably appeal to a wider array of end-users, especially those who may be in a bootstrapping position themselves for their companies. And as more and more of these people bootstrap in public, they become an ideal demographic for Copy.ai to target.  

This seems more or less right in line with Lu’s thinking and assessment of their target userbase and go-to-market strategy, as he remarked on in a Forbes interview:

“Our customers are mostly small businesses and entrepreneurs. The founder/owner is usually both the end-user and decision-maker. Our go-to-market strategy has revolved around generating inbound interest by [‘Building in Public’] on Twitter.”

Running Towards Growth

So that’s MRR, signups, and even the number of tools offered by Copy.ai—but what of those “runs” that the pricing page references?

According to Yacoubian, it’s exactly what it sounds like: the number of returns that can come from a request. And this number can grow to thousands per day, providing the user with ample choices of content for their ads or site copy.

It’s a great idea to track the number of “runs” in the system. And in fact, Yacoubian and Lu take it to the next logical step: tracking copy results generated and results saved.

Those numbers are pretty respectable for a new tool only a few months beyond launch. In the latter two weeks alone of October 2020, Copy.ai saw 1.15M copy results generated.

That number grew to 1.8M generated results by the end of November, 2.1M results by the end of December, and 3.1M generated results most recently at the end of January 2021.

The growth of the number of saved results is also noteworthy: 

In October 2020 alone, 18.5K results were saved, increasing to 25K saved results by the end of November, 32K saved results by the end of December, and 45K saved results by the beginning of February 2021. 

While it seems that the percentage of the results saved to those generated hovers somewhere between 1.3% – 1.6%, that number could quite feasibly increase with the addition of new tools and new use-case scenarios. Copy is one of those things that’s so powerful because it’s so malleable, so if Copy.ai customers start using it more directly for a particular need, it could help them find even greater product-market fit while simultaneously increasing their saved/generated statistic. 

In the most obvious way, this immediately reminds me of how Snapchat tracks the number of snaps sent. It’s an easy enough thing to track and the numbers look good on paper. 

But it serves another purpose, I suspect—it allows Copy.ai to learn and better understand the types of content for which most people are using the toolset.

Is it mostly used for site copy or for ads? Possibly mostly used by novice writers or “non-writers” who just want some decent copy on their sites?

Or is it seeing greater adoption by users who are professional writers and branders to better serve their own customers?

With answers to any or all of these questions come possibilities for Copy.ai to tweak its (ever-expanding) toolkit. 

Building in Public to the Top Spot (And Beyond)

It seems—at least from this vantage point currently—that Copy.ai’s decision to build in public has paid off. In a big way.

They organically grew their MRR to $40K in under 4 months, which—if that’s something they can maintain even as a baseline—would put them at just under a half a million ARR for 2021. Not bad for a company that was spun off a previous week’s build and launched in the last quarter of the year. 

If nothing else, Copy.ai’s quick traction might very well incentivize more companies to try the “build in public” approach and see what happens. As a nice little aside, Copy.ai was posted to Product Hunt just recently in February— months after their initial launch—and claimed the coveted daily top spot with well over a thousand upvotes. Clearly their product and strategy struck a chord with their target market of bootstrapping builders who might be looking for copy. Whether or not this trend continues is anyone’s guess, but for the moment, Copy.ai is a pretty hard-to-ignore example of the benefits of the “build in public” mentality.

Certainly organic growth to $40K MRR is a good way to start the journey.

Recommended

MoxiWorks

$50m Revenue Selling Salesforce for Real Estate Brokerages, Beauty of Multi-Year Deals with Accelerators

Real Estate

3 months ago
She hit $250k MRR in November for Partnership SaaS Zomentum, 4000 Customers, approx $90m Valuation

How he hit $1m Revenue His First Year Building Leasing APIs for Real Estate Industry on Back of $1.75m Agency

Real Estate

4 months ago
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
How ClickFunnels Built a $160m Revenue Empire, $5 Billion+ Exit in 2023?

How ClickFunnels Built a $160m Revenue Empire, $5 Billion+ Exit in 2023?

Bootstrapped

January 16, 2023
16 Steps Outreach.io Took To Build a $1.1 Billion SaaS Company

16 Steps Outreach.io Took To Build a $1.1 Billion SaaS Company

Analysis

March 13, 2022
Top SaaS Companies in Canada

Top SaaS Companies in Canada By Revenue in 2019

Analysis

February 9, 2020
Top 100 San Francisco SaaS Companies

Top 100 San Francisco SaaS Companies

News

April 14, 2020
Stratifyd: 0% Churn on $300k in MRR

Stratifyd: 0% Churn on $300k in MRR

Why Fixing Hotel Operations Has Netted RoomChecking $45k in MRR

Why Fixing Hotel Operations Has Netted RoomChecking $45k in MRR

How Brax Crossed $40k in MRR with Just 3 Employees

How Brax Crossed $40k in MRR with Just 3 Employees

How Skycision Has Used Drones to Help Farmers and Cross $11k in MRR

How Skycision Has Used Drones to Help Farmers and Cross $11k in MRR

Customers.AI

His First Exit Was for $200m, His Next Startup Hit $1m Then Almost Failed, Now 100% YoY Growth at Customers.ai with unique LLM model

B2B SaaS

September 19, 2023
Agilence

The $30m ARR Battle: How 1 VC Forced a 5x Exit When Restaurant SaaS CEO Wanted to Keep Building

B2B SaaS

September 7, 2023
Prism.fm

How this SaaS For Music Venues Survived Covid Then hit $3m ARR

B2B SaaS

September 7, 2023
Carbide Security

How Cyber SaaS Hit $2m ARR and 190 Customers So Fast

Uncategorized

August 31, 2023

Popular Posts

What Is ARR? 2020 Guide

15 Types Of Revenue Models

Run Rate: Why Is It Important? 

How Do You Increase ARPU?

What Is Burn Rate?

Venture Debt: 50+ Options

How To Calculate Revenue Growth

Rule Of 40 For SaaS

SaaS By City

San Francisco

Boston

Chicago

New York

Seattle 

Atlanta

San Diego

Los Angeles

SEE ALL

SaaS By Industry

Analytics

Collaboration & Productivity

Content Management

CRM

ERP

HR

Healthcare

Marketing

SEE ALL

Learn More

SaaS Database

Community

Podcast

Magazine

Book

© Nathan Latka, Inc. Palo Alto, CA

No Result
View All Result
  • Full SaaS Database
  • Metrics
    • ARR
    • ARPU
    • ACV
    • CAC
    • Churn Rate
    • Run Rate
    • TCV
  • Analysis
  • Lists
  • Bootstrapped
  • Venture Backed
  • By Revenue
    • <$1m
    • $1-10m
    • $10-50m
    • Unicorn ($100m+)
  • By Category (A-E)
    • Analytics Software
    • Artificial Intelligence Software
    • Collaboration & Productivity Software
    • Content Experience Software
    • Content Management Systems
    • CRM & Related Software
    • Development Software
    • Digital Advertising Platforms
    • E-Commerce Software
    • ERP Software
  • By Category (H-Z)
    • Hosting Providers
    • HR Software
    • IT Management Software
    • Office Software
    • Online Appointment Scheduling Software
    • Project Management Software
    • Security Software
    • Supply Chain & Logistics Software
    • Value-Added Resellers (VARS)
    • Vertical Industry Software

©Nathan Latka, Inc. Palo Alto, CA

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In